Accordingly, it turns to the underlying petition. The parties consented to a stay of the Housing Court proceeding, so the Court does not address the application for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. (Clinton Towers) to commence eviction proceedings without the necessity of the requisite hearing before HPD, and remanding the matter back to HPD for a proper review. Petitioner commenced this proceeding by order to show cause, seeking to stay the pending eviction proceeding and to obtain an order and judgment that the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) committed an error of law when it allowed respondent Clinton Towers Housing Co., Inc. Gutman, Mintz, Baker, & Sonnenfeldt for Clinton Towers (has not appeared yet, and did not participate in argument), 813 Jericho Turnpike, New Hyde Park, NY 11040 Magsino, 100 Church Street, room 5-175, New York, NY 10007 Counsel - by Sheryl Neufeld, Michelle Goldberg-Cahn, & Teresita V. by John Bart, of counsel to Jeannete Zelhof, 299 Broadway, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10007įor HPD: Zachary W. Vicki Been, as Commissioner of the New York City's Department of Housing Preservation and Development, And CLINTON TOWERS HOUSING CO., INC., Respondents.įor Petitioner: MFY Legal Services, Inc. In the Matter of the Application of Billie Jean Delgado, Petitioner, For a Judgment Pursuant to Article 78 and Declaratory Relief Pursuant to Section 3001 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the printed Official Reports. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |